<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Compare Stuff News &#187; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.compare-stuff.com/category/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.compare-stuff.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Flu Trends</title>
		<link>http://blog.compare-stuff.com/2009/02/19/google-flu-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.compare-stuff.com/2009/02/19/google-flu-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compare-stuff.com/2009/02/19/google-flu-trends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well here&#8217;s a nice bit of search engine trend news: search engine query traffic detects outbreaks, and there&#8217;s accompanying paper in Nature.  Can we compete with that?  Not really, but here&#8217;s a plot anyway:


This shows a peak for January which agrees with the Google and CDC data.  However, this compare-stuff query is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well here&#8217;s a nice bit of search engine trend news: <a href="http://www.google.org/flutrends/">search engine query traffic detects outbreaks</a>, and there&#8217;s accompanying paper in Nature.  Can we compete with that?  Not really, but here&#8217;s a plot anyway:</p>
<p><a href="http://compare-stuff.com/?q1=flu;q2=cough;series=002_rmonths;y0=on;sort=1;.cgifields=sort;.cgifields=y0&#038;fl=1"><img border=0 width=400 height=200 src="http://compare-stuff.com/plot.cgi?w=400&#038;h=200&#038;l=Sep08,Oct08,Nov08,Dec08,Jan09,Feb09&#038;q1=0.2888,0.2945,0.2794,0.2729,0.7531,0.7639&#038;q2=0.4447,0.4747,0.4433,0.4211,0.98,0.9103&#038;t=lines&#038;l1=flu&#038;l2=cough&#038;embedded=1"/></a></p>
<p><span id="more-35"></span></p>
<p>This shows a peak for January which agrees with the Google and CDC data.  However, this compare-stuff query is on all pages in all countries.  We could narrow it down a bit to &#8220;flu&#8221; and &#8220;cough&#8221; along with &#8220;New York&#8221; on a web page:</p>
<p><a href="http://compare-stuff.com/?q1=flu%20%22new%20york%22;q2=cough%20%22new%20york%22;series=002_rmonths;y0=on;.cgifields=y0&#038;fl=1"><img border=0 width=400 height=200 src="http://compare-stuff.com/plot.cgi?w=400&#038;h=200&#038;l=Sep08,Oct08,Nov08,Dec08,Jan09,Feb09&#038;q1=0.3991,0.3846,0.3865,0.3667,0.8357,0.7438&#038;q2=0.3968,0.3956,0.4073,0.3904,0.95,0.98&#038;t=lines&#038;l1=flu%20%22new%20york%22&#038;l2=cough%20%22new%20york%22&#038;embedded=1"/></a></p>
<p>and you get similar results.</p>
<p>At this point it&#8217;s worth pointing out that <a href="http://technorati.com/chart/">Technorati&#8217;s charts</a> are looking good these days, although they take a long time to generate.  Here&#8217;s one for <a href="http://technorati.com/chart/flu?compare=flu&#038;compare1=cough&#038;chartdays=180">flu vs. cough</a>.  Blogs are probably better than the web as a whole for this kind of analysis, but there won&#8217;t be a blog version of Compare Stuff coming any time soon, sorry!</p>
<link href="http://scm-pe.technorati.com/x/static/css/tr-chart-widget.css?1234391439" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<div id="tr-sm-chart-widget">
<div id="widget-title">Keyword popularity across the Blogosphere</div>
<div id="widget-subtext">This chart illustrates how many times blog posts across the Blogosphere contained the following keywords.</div>
<p><a id="widget-chart-image" href="http://technorati.com/chart/flu?compare1=cough&#038;chartdays=180?=newchartwidget"><img src="http://technorati.com/chart/flu/image?compare1=cough&#038;chartSize=widget&#038;days=180" /></a>
<div id="widget-keywords"> <a href="http://technorati.com/search/flu" class="" style="color:#d93214">flu</a> vs.  <a href="http://technorati.com/search/cough" class="" style="color:#6286c4">cough</a></div>
<div id="widget-footer"><a id="configure-link" href="http://technorati.com/chart/flu?compare1=cough&#038;chartdays=180?=newchartwidget">&raquo; Configure this widget for your site!</a><a id="technorati-link" href="http://technorati.com/"><img src="http://scm-pe.technorati.com/x/static/images/widget/chart-technorati.png?1234391439"></a></div>
</div>
<p>If you&#8217;re into all this kind of stuff, check out the <a href="/category/pubmed/">legacy PubMed version of Compare Stuff</a> &#8211; where you can plot the relative amount of influenza research in different countries for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.compare-stuff.com/2009/02/19/google-flu-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open access scientific publishing</title>
		<link>http://blog.compare-stuff.com/2007/11/27/open-access-scientific-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.compare-stuff.com/2007/11/27/open-access-scientific-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-axis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compare-stuff.com/2007/11/27/open-access-scientific-publishing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The plot below shows the biological sub-disciplines leading in the area of open access publishing (click on the plot for readable x-axis labels):

Bioinformatics has by far the largest amount of &#8220;open access&#8221; chatter.  In purple you can see the relatively flat distribution of &#8220;journal&#8221; as a control.  As a bioinformaticist myself this seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plot below shows the biological sub-disciplines leading in the area of open access publishing (click on the plot for readable x-axis labels):</p>
<p><a href="http://compare-stuff.com/?q1=%22open%20access%22;q2=journal;series=500_scifields;y0=on;sort=1;.cgifields=sort;.cgifields=y0&#038;fl=1"><img border=0 width=400 height=200 src="http://compare-stuff.com/plot.cgi?w=400&#038;h=200&#038;l=bioinf,immunol,biochem,pharma,biology,biotech,ling,comp.%20sci.,chemistry,physics,geology,maths,astronomy,psych&#038;q1=0.98,0.3706,0.32,0.2786,0.2691,0.2315,0.1897,0.1596,0.1464,0.1388,0.1303,0.1216,0.09969,0.09155&#038;q2=0.1413,0.189,0.1381,0.1606,0.1112,0.1156,0.1356,0.06811,0.08085,0.08318,0.07041,0.08256,0.07528,0.09027&#038;t=bars&#038;l1=%22open%20access%22&#038;l2=journal&#038;embedded=1"/></a></p>
<p>Bioinformatics has by far the largest amount of &#8220;open access&#8221; chatter.  In purple you can see the relatively flat distribution of &#8220;journal&#8221; as a control.  As a bioinformaticist myself this seems to make sense, as the leading figures in the open access movement come from this field.  However, other communities (physics, computer science) have been operating an informal open access model for a lot longer (preprint servers and/or widespread preprint availability).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.compare-stuff.com/2007/11/27/open-access-scientific-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
